>Ummm, I thought this was a clause for OGL (am I >wrong?), the D20 doesn't bother me as much as it does >belong to WOTC and they can restrict it however they >want. The same thing in OGL worries me though as no >one has to use OGL and therefore would be in better >shape of avoiding the whole issue by using other means >of publishing---which hurts the very thing we're >trying to achieve. Exactly my point. Something like this might in the OGL might indeed be a "showstopper" for us and would prevent us from using OGL. It rightly belongs in the D20 stuff. Faust ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Adam Benedict Canning
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Dan Carreker
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Dan Carreker
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Faustus von Goethe
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Corey Reid
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Weldon Dodd
- [Open_Gaming] Remove Ryan S. Johnson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Kal Lin
- Re: RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates FrogGod
- Re: RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates FrogGod
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Faustus von Goethe
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Alec A. Burkhardt