[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I want the OGL to work just as much as everyone else, and I want all
> of the creators who participate in it to succeed, but IMO the current OGL is
> confusing, contradictory, complicated, user unfriendly, too narrow minded in
> some places yet too broad in others.
> . . .snip . . .
> Regardless, I don't like to complain without also suggesting a solution.
> So, here's my solution: Why don't we write the OGL ourselves and THEN let a
> lawyer or ten look over it for problems? Not to sound plebeian, but having
> Wizards write and control the OGL is sort of like having England write the US
> constitution.
. . . snip . . .
First, I haven't had any problem with the language that wasn't clarified by the
discussions held here -- that's the reason for the list, I think.
Second, there's certainly nothing preventing a group of like mindedgamers from
coming up with their own OGL -- and paying for their own legal council to
examine.
Third, the slight Wizard bias doesn't bother me as it is their game they're using
for their version of the OGL.
Richard
--
The Gallery
- http://webhome.idirect.com/~rpace/
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
