Nicholas H.M. Caldwell wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Will Hindmarch wrote:
> >
> > There is a slight, but important, matter of grammar here. "Compelled"
> > suggests that the person being "compelled" is somewhat (or completely) unwilling.
> > I think that's the interpretation you're using. If so, I agree with you.
>
> Actually it's a matter of semantics (;-)), but I *do* mean "compelled" as
> in "forced" or "coerced" by the activities of "wrathful nimrods".
Fair enough. : ) I should have said "language," or even better "dialectics."
"Compelled" does not mean the same thing in English (the trunk of the language tree) as
it does in, say, court. The implications are different.
Sigh. Semantics.
w
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks kevin kenan
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Rogers Cadenhead
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Rogers Cadenhead
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Will Hindmarch
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Will Hindmarch
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Rogers Cadenhead
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Will Hindmarch
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Will Hindmarch
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks John Nephew
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Will Hindmarch
