On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Clark Peterson wrote: > I don't believe this is true. Licenses are legally > binding (unless proven otherwise in court) to both > parties involved in the license. The owner of > the IP cannot revoke the license without violating the > license." > > I am a lawyer. I'm telling you how it is. But of > course, you can believe what you want. OK, fine. You are a lawyer. Licenses are binding. Is the online policy a licenses? Ah, that be the rub... -- http://www.spellbooksoftware.com If guns are outlawed can we use swords? ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Jason Lotito
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Russ Taylor
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Russ Taylor
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Russ Taylor
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Russ Taylor
- RE: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A D20STL caution Faustus von Goethe
