>From: "Lynn Fredricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I happen to agree with Ryan. A business-like response to a possible
>infringement would be to settle it in a business-like fashion -- contact
>the
>offender directly. If that doesn't work, then make some noise in the
>appropriate place and in the appropriate way. Some people don't think this
>is the place for it.
BUT... some people do... So, far the votes FOR are about even with the
votes AGAINST (shall we have a hand recount? ::grin::).
Lynn, I agree with you. I contacted Mr. Kim first. My intent in posting to
the list was emphatically NOT to say:
A. "Lets blast this a-hole..."
But was rather:
B. "Geeze, I hope nobody is linking to the WRONG FAQ."
I am at this time seriously regretting the WORDING of the subject header on
that message, as I see it really left the wrong impression. This is WHY the
alternative wording of the subject header ("MR KIM IS OK GUY") in my
apology.
For Info: I wrote that first message at 0630 on Monday morning after very
little sleep and being awoken early by a phone call informing me my FAQ had
been stolen - thus vilating my own long-standing and oft-broken rule against
posting before the first cup of coffee.
Faust
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
