[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>> Unless it specifcally had to be "article in a periodical."
>> 
>> And, not if it was "an articile in a periodical, and all references to
>> that article in that or any other issue of the periodicial."
>> 
> The definition of a periodical is such that that can be twisted...weasel 
> words like these will only serve to A) confuse people and B) make it to where 
> no magazine will have any interest in including that material due to the 
> artificially stupid restraints...which will hurt the publicity effort.

?  You're being unreasonable.  Magazine publishers know what a 
periodical is, and they know what articles are.  "Treat all references 
to that article as advertising for an OGL'd work" is easy enough that 
even a non-gamer can understand it.

> I could say "See the new <insert D&D logo here> inside!"
> 
> And run that same capsule review (or a different 2 paragraph version) in 
> every issue.

Which would open you up for a breach of the OGL--WotC would argue that 
you are misusing their trademark, and they could even leave the OGL out 
of it.

> Here's the review - "I thought it was cool, and had cool pictures."
> 
> Now, you gonna try and define a review now so a real one has to be generated? 

No, the market can handle that, silly.

>  How about making sure someone doesn't run the same review issue after issue?

See above.  "Misuse of trademark."  "Misleading Advertising."  Oh, the 
suits can just pile up, if needs be.

>>> See how it can all be twisted?
>> 
>> Technically, yes.  Which is why the "reasonable man" standard exists.
>> 
> Be honest -- how many "reasonable men" exist in gaming these days?

Doesn't matter.  We're talking litigation, not gaming.  (assuming that 
someone tries to twist the OGL in a bad way... if everyone plays nice, 
no one goes to court.)

> Don't try and over-define things or you'll create situations that are 
> nightmares for everyone except the guy taking advantage of you...

*sigh*  Not true.  It is feasable and reasonable to make your contract 
(the OGL) do exactly what you want it to do and no more--it just is more 
work than is worth it at this time.


DM

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to