Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works?

[Doug Meerschaert]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The end result is that you can have OGC, non-OGC, and non-OGL'd 
> material in
> the same work but the work overall effectively must abide by the terms 
> of the
> most restricted element (the OGC). Call it infection or call it 
> "coverage"
> but legally a whole work doesn't "become" OGL'd if you use OGC.

I think you're splitting hairs.

The OGL defines OGC and PI.  Anything that *isn't* identified as OGC or 
PI is just "content" (or whatever) and is governed by regular law--aside 
from those rights that you give up as part of the OGL.

There's no difference between "non OGC OGL'd content" and "content that 
just happens to be in the same work as OGC."

DM

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org