[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am I the only one that finds that both unreasonable and bizarre? No. I agree, there should be some workaround. However, it's just a faucet of the license. A game magazine could easily just write the various companies and say "may I use your trademark to refer to your game in a review?" And we've been debating the can of worms a license change could bring. DM ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? FrogGod
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? David Bolack
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? LaPierre, Bob
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? GoldRushG
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? GoldRushG
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? David Bolack
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? David Bolack
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? David Bolack
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? David Bolack
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? GoldRushG
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? GoldRushG
