Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works?

[Doug Meerschaert]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Then why did they *bother* with the OGL at all?  We have all hashed out here the 
>fact that using that you could create a book that was a virtual clone (albeit in 
>different words) of the PHB and put that into competition with the D&D PHB.  Which is 
>*exactly* the situation they appear to not want to happen...

But you can't *SAY* it's a clone of the PHB.  Or slap the d20 logo on 
it.  In fact, the "PHB Clone" is exactly why WotC wrote the OGL like 
they did.

Of course, what WotC can do, anyone can do, as wel.  ;)


DM

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org