> This isn't as bad as I expected, but is worse than I had hoped. Are the > Dragon and Dungeon editors comfortable with these restrictions? I suspect that it's the reason they're planning another magazine, rather than just adding d20 content to Dragon. They can keep all the OGL issues in one "box" and focus on making sure they handle the box correctly. Ryan ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Justin Bacon
- RE: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Will Hindmarch
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Alec A. Burkhardt
- RE: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL John Nephew
- RE: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] A vaccine for OGL Aaron Smalley
