William Olander wrote:
> I'm not meaning to step on anyone's toes here. I probably wasn't as
> clear as I'd meant to be. Happens more than you'd think. I was
> refering to complete and total lack of safe harbor. Ie. If you print
> it, then it's open. That includes all champaign settings, NPCs, etc..
> Not just rules.
>
I might be mistaken, but I think you've got a faulty definition of "safe
harbor."
AFAIK, "safe harbor" refers to the parts of the OGL that keep you from
getting sued... not the parts that let you keep things closed.
DM
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
