-----Original Message-----
From: woodelf (lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>specifically, why is it called "free20"? why not just use the OOGL,
>which *requires* you to have an open-content work? remember, *any*
>game can be licensed under the WOGL. in fact, given the stricture of
>some components of D20SRD possibly being designated PI (we don't know
>yet), an all-free game is likely *not* to be based on D20, so why a
>"20" in the name of a label intended to designate free gaming
>materials?
OOGL?
Good question about Free20, though. Do you have a better idea?
> given that i'm not likely to produce anything that is
>based on either WotC's D20 system, or a d20-based mechanic of any
>sort, why would i want to give it the misleading label of "free20",
>which will almost certainly make gamers think of D20?
So far, almost *all* of the work done under the OGL has been d20-style. In
fact, if it wouldn't prohibit software tools, I'd have kept in the original
requirement to be allowed to use the d20 logo.
DM
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
