On 29 Nov 01, The scribbled a note about [Ogf-l] (d)20 Products - the Good a:
> > It DOES worry me, though, that the ratio is only about 2 to 1 in terms of > "not confusing/confusing OGC," 2 to 1 in terms of "not crippled/crippled", > and 2 to 1 in terms of "significant amounts of OGC to small amounts of > OGC." Were you on the list when Ryan sent out the "Nasty Letter"? WotC is planning/doing a review of books using the OCL/d20STL on a yearly basis. Clearly defined PI and OGC is required by the OGL, so those who aren't clear will most likely be hearing from them at review time. The clarity of properly marked OGC will eventually clear itself up as time goes on. Eventually it should all be clear. Unfortunately, your definition of crippled is not against what is laid out in the OGL, but hopefully that too will disappear as time goes on. While distasteful, it is allowed by the OGL.... Perhaps such companies should/could provide a list of generic type names for things that they "cripple", and then still use their unique names in their products (with the generic name in parenthesis). ************************* ********TANSTAAFL******** ************************* Rasyr (Tim Dugger) E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
