In a message dated 10/7/01 5:33:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< 1. I wasn't refering to the stated goals of the logo, those are written from a "What we can do for you" perspective. I meant in terms of a corporate "What the logos and the license will preserve for us and our corporate identity." Usually that's something you don't advertize.>> Interesting point. << 2. I've noticed. You seem to be rather stuborn about re-inventing the wheel.>> I'm sorry you see my inability to discuss certain details as being "stubborn." I've no intention of being stubborn about anything, but if something doesn't work for us then it doesn't make any sense for us to try to "force" it into a pidgeonhole, wouldn't you agree? << 3. I could go back and find the thread about re-writing the D20 STL if you wanted. It's a perfectly legal option that the Free20 project is using to create a logo for themselves.They're even doing up a SRD for themselves. The rules aren't all that different from the D20 base however which as I think about it is a little dissapointing. I'd like to see some larger game type variations. I guess I should work on that myself if I want to change it. >> That's an option for you, I suppose. Folks, our plans are not complete, nor is the development on the Action! System, nor the licenses for that matter. Let's not start attacking something that isn't done. No final decisions have been made one way or another. Mark Arsenault President, Gold Rush Entertainment, Inc. | http://www.goldrushg.com Executive Director, The Game Publishers Assoc. | http://www.thegpa.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 20% off all design & publishing packages! http://www.goldenpillarpublishing.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
