Max Skibinsky wrote: >The problem is not with software guys, the problem is >with the license which somehow ended up with enough legal loopholes to blast >even best-intended and open-content software as "not clearly identified". If >software is not Open Source, doesn't mean its not Open Content. > Not knowing the full details I can't be sure... but "it's all OGC" seems clear enough to me.
>Bottom line is there were a lot of negative comments on virtually any suggestion >how to identify OGC in software and virtually no constructive suggestions how to >overcome these difficulties. All this combined (plus email silence) creates the >impression that creation of new Open Gaming Content software is unwelcome and >discouraged by OGF. Of course this is just my personall impression, which could >be wrong. > The OGF is, really, no one more than these mailing lists. AFAIK, Ryan has in the past been unable to go out on a limb because he was a WotC agent--and now that he isn't, he's not saying a lot more for pretty much the same reasons. WotC won't say yes or no until someting shows up--just as with a for-print item. The few software items that HAVE come up have been commented upon. DM _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
