But the problem is that the monsters in the MM are actually a 'world' of creatures and it is likely that WoTC wants to continue to control that world. In other words it would be like asking them to open up Forgotten realms to allow people to write FR adventures. Plus, if you are writing an adventure you don't need culture, descriptions, etc.. All you need is a stat block since you are assuming ownership of the core rules.
- Marc At 03:14 PM 1/15/2002 +0000, you wrote: >>From: "Marc Tassin, Ilium Software" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>I agree and have said it many times. This entire "you don't make enough >>stuff free" is getting old. It was only a matter of time before WoTC got >>targeted too. Give it a rest people. Getting ANYTHING for free (ie: open) >>is more than you ever would have had in the past. Be thankful for that >>fact and get over the fact that you can't just use other people's ideas as >>your own. Spend more time coming up with ideas and less time complaining >>that other people won't let you use theirs. > >You may have missed the reply to this which clearly stated that the >"ocean" of free material is deeply appreciated. > >This wasn't about desiring more free stuff. The question being raised >wasn't even related to those who want to evolve their own game system >based on the SRD. >The point made is that those wishing to create adventures based on the >core SRD race descriptions don't have access to much more than the game >mechanics themselves (statblock info), and have to even carefully examine >any visual artwork, background and racial culture that relates more >obviously to the MM than the public domain. This is not, in fact, what >WotC themselves would necessarily want, since they legally limit the >ability of independant publishers to contribute adventure gaming material >in a fashion consistent with the Monster manual, as found at "almost all >gaming tables". > >The question being asked is whether this is a desired effect, or an >unfortunate side-effect, perhaps requiring some kind of license expansion >for those that merely want to publish adventures compatible with the >purchased core books. As it stands, many 3rd party publishers, through >careless derivation of artwork, background information, or basic racial >behaviour from the MM, are in technical violation of the license under >which they are effectively must publish. I'm wagering, however, that WotC >don't have any problem with most of these works, and are probably thankful >for the general contribution they make to the enriched D20 genre. >They actually serve to enforce the value of the MM itself. > >I don't think it's a problem with an easy answer, since inclusion of >artwork and background info in the SRD effectively nullifies the >marketability of the MM, which could then be published by virtually >anyone, and electronically for free. > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: >http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > >_______________________________________________ >Ogf-l mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
