Now a DM running Call Cathulu or Kult is perfectly fine though right? Or maybe the DM should only run good guys? And we'll play games based on polite social interaction?
I jest because it seems silly to condemn one set of "bad guys" over another. At 01:13 PM 1/17/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:24:03 -0800, Todd Landrum wrote: > >Right. They're encouraging the *DM* to be al Queda terrorists > >gunning for US targets. > > >> So what? > >I was trying to point out the contradiction of the original poster who said >"it's not like their asking the players to be al Queda terrorists". > >I don't think it's important whether the players or the DM is running the >"bad guys". The issue at hand is whether the subject matter is approriate >for a game. I don't agree with the line of thought that says -- it's only a >game/make-believe so anything is OK (anyone for a game of High School >Massacre or maybe Pedophile - The RPG). I think you can also criticize one >particular game without condemming the entire hobby. > >For the record, I see nothing wrong with the subject matter of this proposed >game. It doesn't sound like any fun to me and I'd never play, but I don't >see any cause for outrage. > >_______________________________________________ >Ogf-l mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
