----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Clark Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] Refer?


"When it comes to others using the open content, they
can use the citations similarly in their own work,
because they are a point of fact: The feat "such and
such" can be found on page xxx of "so and so" by
WotC."

That is exactly what WotC does not want you to do
(presuming you are talking about books other than PHB,
DMG or MM).

>>
I'm just examining the principles at work. Anyway, I wasn't aware that there were any 
special rules for the PHB, DMG and MM, just that those books contributed most to the 
SRD. From my understanding, the SRD is open; the PHB and so on are just as closed as 
Tome and Blood, or anything else. 
<<

"I'm not so much looking for a loophole as thinking
that it must be possible, somehow, and trying to
figure out how."

If you arent looking for a loophole then why bother
with it?

>>
I bother with a lot of things. I thought that was the point of all this - to figure 
out what is legit and what ain't.
<<

There may be a way around it, I dont know. I believe
there is a contribution problem even if you put the
reference "outside" of your OGC designation, because
"using" material derived from the SRD makes that
content OCG even if you dont designate it as such. 

But bottom line is WotC doesnt want you doing it.
Pushing may just cause WotC to scrap the project. Lets
not piss in the pool.

Clark

>>
I hope you don't see any coloured water floating around me. I'm trying to get my brain 
around this and you'd be overreacting to assume I was out to change the rules or force 
an issue.

Cheers, 
:L.




_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to