On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:15:03PM -0500, Doug Meerschaert wrote:
> I've got to wonder why Wizards has yet to release an OGL'd rulebook.
> 
> Not that I don't think that they have every right to keep their rules 
> closed, but it's not as if their desingers are incapable of following 
> the same license that they want rank amatuers in companies one-tenth's 
> their roleplaying department's size to follow.
> 
> Keeping the OGL out of the core books was understandable; it was a risky 
> effort, and they weren't sure if it was going to fly.  But they knew 
> that d20-Modern was going to have its rules released on the very same 
> day as it hit the shelves--why not put the rules in the book and not 
> on-line, and give those of us who just want the rules an incentive to 
> buy the book?

They'd have to separate out character generation rules and experience
award rules.  There'd be a risk of screwing up the OGL declaration and
accidentally OGLing things that they don't want OGL'd.  I can't see
any reason why they should take the risk, from their point of view.

-- 
        Bryant Durrell [] http://www.innocence.com/~durrell [] 9/11/2001
 [----------------------------------------------------------------------------]
           "The world breaks everyone, and afterward, some are strong
                      at the broken places."  -- Hemingway
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to