<<This is basically what's known as the "appendix" method, and it's come up
before. There's been some debate over whether or not it's a valid method,
but as far as I can recall the people with legal backgrounds here all seemed
to agree that it was not.
>>
Got any clue as to what the thread was titled so that I can dig it up in the archives so as not to raise old issues?
BTW -- why was this method rejected -- on the grounds that they considered:
a) the CD-ROM to be a separate work?
or
b) on the grounds that the OGC is somehow not clearly identified?
or
c) something else?
I would think that extracting most all of the OGC onto CD-ROM would make it extremely clear what the OGC was, perhaps even moreso that a textual description, and certainly without the formatting weirdness many developers use to mix PI and OGC.
It would be neat to label the text file so that it could say: "Page 58" and then list all the OGC on page 58 of the printed text.
Lee
