<<If I'm holding the book and have no computer next to me, how can I tell
what is OGC? I can't. Therefore it is not clearly identified. IMHO. >>
I make a "book" which is actually a set of three-hole punched, loose leaf pages shrink wrapped together that I declare to be a single work. I use an OGC textual declaration rather than fonts or boxes. You put it in a binder but you accidentally leave out (or choose to leave out) the OGC declaration page. You are at the gaming table. Try though you might you can no longer figure out what the OGC is any more.
Is that because I failed to live up to the license? Or because you have lost the page with the OGC declaration?
In any case, you are now in the same situation as not having the CD-ROM in front of you in a very similar way.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I'd think that the big question is whether it can reasonably be said that a print work and a CD-ROM packaged with it can be declared, by the author, to be a single work if he so desires to consider them a single work for the purposes of sales and law. The distinct types of media could potentially be construed as the items constituting two separate works.
If they can't be considered parts of the same work, then any further discussion is moot. If they can, then the fact that you can physically separate one part of the work from another should have no impact on licensing.
Since IANAL, maybe I'm wrong. Which is a reason to pose the question for discussion, right?
Lee
