I completely misunderstood PI, then. I've never really concerned myself with it (obviously a good thing, apparently), since everything I've published or had published was all OGC or someone else's property (contract work).
-Mike --- Clark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now here, as I understand it, is the crux of Alec's > > argument. If the > > material is non-OGC, the OGL does not apply to it. > > Therefore, the > > designation of PI has no meaning within non-OGC, > > only within OGC. > > He and I have always agreed on this. In fact, I > proposed it long ago. > > > And > > therefore, PI is NOT non-OGC; > > Corrrect. PI is a subset of OGC. If the content isnt > mixed with OGC, there is no need to designate it as > PI. > > Clark > > > > ===== > http://www.necromancergames.com > "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" > _______________________________________________ > Ogf-l mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
