--- Clark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would say that a strict interpretation would > > require you to mark an > > in-product advertisement as non-OGC, since it is not > > a game mechanic, etc. > > Or you could argue that by the definition of OGC, > unless marked, and in-product ad could never be > considered OGC and thus doesnt need to be marked as > non-OGC. > > There are three types of content: > > 1. Non-OGC > 2. OGC that is not PI > 3. OGC that is PI. > > I dont have to designate 1. > > I just need to "clearly indicate" 2, and 3 if I have > PI. > > Clark
OK, I'll agree with that. Perhaps the ad example was a tad overzealous. -Mike __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
