On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 08:03:11PM -0800, Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
> Something that I intended to go into earlier - what is the proposed
> ABI spec saying about Mesa's "fake" GLX?
Nothing, yet. My first reaction was that an ABI group shouldn't say
anything about it so long as it behaved according to the GLX API
specification, but on reflection I think that an implementation
satisfying oglbase should be required to actually support indirect
rendering to a remote GLX-capable X server. Network transparency is
fundamental to X, and the opportunity to ensure that everyone using
Linux will be able to have 3D interoperability seems too good to pass
up.
Jon Leech
SGI
