On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Jon Leech wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 08:03:11PM -0800, Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
> > Something that I intended to go into earlier - what is the proposed
> > ABI spec saying about Mesa's "fake" GLX?
> 
>     Nothing, yet. My first reaction was that an ABI group shouldn't say
> anything about it so long as it behaved according to the GLX API
> specification, but on reflection I think that an implementation
> satisfying oglbase should be required to actually support indirect
> rendering to a remote GLX-capable X server. Network transparency is
> fundamental to X, and the opportunity to ensure that everyone using
> Linux will be able to have 3D interoperability seems too good to pass
> up.

I had assumed that this was a requirment of oglbase. Breaking compatability
or removing functionallity would have been very bad.


                                Stuart

Stuart R. Anderson                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Metro Link Incorporated                          South Carolina Office
4711 North Powerline Road                        129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309                   Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.938.0283                              voice: 803.951.3630
fax:   954.938.1982                              SkyTel: 800.405.3401
http://www.metrolink.com/

Reply via email to