In your message of 24 March 2000 you write:

> I believe all that's left is Steve's concerns about bringing apps to
> Linux, recompiling, and dying because of libGL.so not containing some
> extension functions.
> 
> To address that Steve, if you know of some extensions for which this
> might happen, let me know what they are and I'll put stubs for those
> functions in libGL.so ASAP.  I suspect this list would include some SGI
> extensions which Mesa never implemented.  This should help minimize
> problems.

Brian, this may solve the problem for the current subset of
extensions, but is merely a hack. Silently including glext.h from gl.h
changes established semantics for including gl.h. It should be up to
the application at compile-time to decided whether it wants those
changed semantics or not. Let's not minimize the problems, but instead
address the real issue.

- Thomas
-- 
             Thomas Roell   /\         An imperfect plan executed violently
             Xi Graphics   /  \/\ _     is far superior to a perfect plan. 
         [EMAIL PROTECTED]   /   /  \ \     
                         / Oelch! \ \             George Patton

Reply via email to