In your message of 29 March 2000 you write:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Thomas Roell wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:51:11 -0700 (MST)
> > From: Thomas Roell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling
> >
> > Ballot:
> >
> > I vote YES on vote #1.
> > I vote A on vote #2.
> >
>
> Welcome back... hehe, that's exactly what I was hoping you'd vote
> for ;-)
Actually, I would rather have voted for B, but I want to avoid C at
any cost, as it will break everybodies currently existing code.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Roell /\ An imperfect plan executed violently
Xi Graphics / \/\ _ is far superior to a perfect plan.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / / \ \
/ Oelch! \ \ George Patton
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling akin
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling dave
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Brett Johnson
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Leath Muller
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Mark Kilgard
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor hand... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor hand... Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling Ron Bielaski
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] VOTE: glext.h/preprocessor handling David Blythe
