On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:17:40PM -0400, Mike Caron wrote: > James Paige wrote: > >Eeep! > > > >1) I was about to cut the branch for Xocolatl, but now I am not so sure. > >Do I cut from revision 2302? Do I delay another week or two for further > >testing and more features? > > I've tested this thoroughly. Seriously. Let me add the other sprite > loading functions, then I'll call this feature complete. > > If you want, cut it at 2302, but I suspect a bunch of people would be > annoyed if they learned what they just missed. ;)
It will just motivate them to keep testing nightlies :) > I was going to add some debugs, but I opted not to. Maybe I will... > > As for the bounds checking, I don't want to clamp the arguments, since > in many cases, this will create worse bugs than something just not working. I mean't using something like bound_arg, and the family of bound_ functions similar to it. Not to be confused with the bad-and-evil-for-this-purpose bound function. Confusing naming schemes are not just a habit in OHR land, they are a /design philosophy/ ;) --- James _______________________________________________ Ohrrpgce mailing list [email protected] http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
