On 8/23/2010 2:01 PM, James Paige wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:50:55PM -0400, Mike Caron wrote:
On 8/23/2010 1:39 PM, James Paige wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:22:00AM +1200, Ralph Versteegen wrote:
On 24 August 2010 04:33, James Paige<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:56:27AM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
teeemcee
2010-08-23 04:56:27 -0700 (Mon, 23 Aug 2010)
218
More horror! MenuDefs are meant to be deleted with ClearMenuData, or they leak
all their items! Fix the numerous places where we were doing that.
It would be REALLY great if FB let us use constructors and destructors.
Isn't -lang deprecated the thing that is holding us back from using
them?
---
James
Yep.
There are a few UDTs now which have to be manually destructed, and I
feel really bad every time I introduce one because it makes our code
less friendly and more and more C-like.
I suspect that constructor and destructor support could be added to
-lang deprecated by patching a few lines in the compiler, and I am
almost considering trying it. And if I didn't have all these OHR
features to work on, I would definitely be working on fb2c++ right
now.
Have you been following the forum thread in which a couple people have
threatened to bribe you to work on it with the goal of an XNA port?
What, really? While I would really enjoy a .NET port of free basic, I
doubt this would happen any time in the near future.
Oh, is XNA .NET only? I had mistakenly assumed that it allowed you to
make thin .NET wrappers around mostly C code, like you can with
iPhone+ObjectiveC and Android+Java
I'm reasonably confident that it is. I'm not 100% sure, though.
---
James
_______________________________________________
Ohrrpgce mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
_______________________________________________
Ohrrpgce mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
