It was removed because there should be nothing in there. The documentation
EXPLICITLY says that. This document also explicitly lists where additions
should go (in /opt). This is not exactly a new standard.

That said, why would you look for something in /usr/local? If we are just
going to willy-nilly be adding directories, we should just have it search
the entire filesystem, it's the only way be sure.

If there is a desire to change from Solaris standards to the Linux Standard
Base, so be it, but if we are going down that route, I'd like to see it
explicitly made clear.

Andrew Hettinger
http://Prominic.NET  ||  [email protected]
Tel:  866.339.3169 (toll free) -or- +1.217.356.2888 x.110 (int'l)
Fax: 866.372.3356 (toll free) -or- +1.217.356.3356            (int'l)


Gordon Ross <[email protected]> wrote on 08/09/2011 09:03:03 PM:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Andrew M. Hettinger
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I realized after sending that, I was unclear.
> > What I intended to say was "I would encourage the standard set by
> > filesystem(5) to be followed.
> >
> > Sorry for any confusion.
> >
> > Andrew Hettinger
>
> OK, and I think we are, by simply not installing anything there.
> But is there harm in having some tools offer to look there for
> site-specific additions?  Lots of tools do that.
>
> I'd still like to know why that was removed from all the cmake
> configuration "lists of places it looks for things".  Just curious...
>
> Gordon
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Reply via email to