> > So, this basically looks OK to me, however: > > The "one big path" file is an annoyance. It makes it hard to see [ "one big patch" - oops]
> how much of that is just removing /usr/local from search paths, > and what is other porting stuff needed for OpenIndiana. > I would have preferred one patch file for the /usr/local removal, > and separate ones for other types of changes. (but please > note, I'm not advocating one patch per touched file) > > And that brings up another question: Do we want to remove > /usr/local from the search paths as was done for Solaris? > I wonder why this was done? Anyone know? > Do we want to continue this change? > > Gordon > _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
