On 09/10/2013 17:05, Thomas Wagner wrote:
Maybe the problems dicussed here are only a symptom and *not* the root cause.
No, this discussion came up because some people seem to be confused about the role of /hipster. This post from Alaisdair Lumsden clearly described the purpose of /hipster:
On 11 July 2013 at 17:53 Alasdair Lumsden <alasdai...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi All, Back in the days of oi-build, we tried to have a process, and enforce quality, and it just resulted in super slow progress followed by near-death. Andrzej didn't contribute at all as he didn't like the bureaucracy, he just wants to hack-and-go. So after all that, I basically think Andrzej is completely right with his current approach - breaking things should be allowed. You can't make an omelette quickly and easily without breaking a few eggs. Hipster is an experimental development branch for making rapid progress. If you break something, you can fix it after, no big deal. I do think that /dev should get moved to /release, and /hipster should go to /dev. Not many know about hipster beyond the oi-dev list. It would show people in the outside world that progress is being made on OI. ... Regards, Alasdair
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
