Coincidentally, I just used bind (elsewhere, for something I haven't submitted
a review for yet) for the very first time today. It's wickedly convenient.
BTW, I know some people are nervous about so much boost use. But in fact,
almost 100% of our uses of boost are from a very few subsections of boost that
also happen to have been adopted into C++11. If you are one of those nervous
people, then when you see "boost::" just mentally translate to "std::, but with
a fallback implementation for people with older compilers".
-- lg
On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:05 AM, Chris Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> No, no, use boost::bind!!! (Which I think is identical to std::bind
>> in C++11)
>
> Good point, I'd forgotten about bind for some reason.
>
> (Stefan: boost::bind is more or less the same under the covers to what I
> suggested, but far more elegant since it involves much much less
> boilderplate.)
>
> ~Chris
--
Larry Gritz
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
