Quoting Jonathan Rochkind <[email protected]>:
> > A side discussion, but I don't understand the difference between the > "defined whole bibliographic entity" you mention, and a FRBR Work in the > first place. I think that's what a FRBR Work already is. So I'm not > sure what the FRBR group rejects, unless they're agreeing with me that > that's what the Work entity already is. Jonathan, my "whole entity" would be WEMI, not just Work. It would be the entire Group 1. kc > > What reasons will a FRBR Work not work as this "bibliographic whole > entity", or how do you see it being different from a FRBR Work? I > suspect that some such failings of FRBR Work may really be reasons that > FRBR Work needs to be tweaked or enhanced, not reasons you need another > entity. > > Jonathan > > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] > -- Karen Coyle [email protected] http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
