Wow from what I gather a 1970 w-30 cutlass would not be considered a muscle
car. 
 But a similarly equipped 442 would be a muscle car.
 Because of the badging on the car.

Still a nice link Milton
ron




rodney fama OCA #033098
1969 cutlass s
1969 442 north carolinia car
1969 442  cali car. assembly required stay away from www.calicars.cc what a
hassle.
1972 cutlass convertable
1976 phx y-76 arizona regional car. assy. required
1977 cutlass supreme  (3)
1986 honda shadow vt 1100c  cruiser
1987 cutlass supreme
1989 chevy k-2500 4*4 pick up
1991 yamaha warrior atv
1994 chevy  caprice 9c-1 police pkg
732-986-6388 cell
732-254-9500 wk 2 pm best time to call week days
web site. shows disc brake conversion using 79 trans am rear disc on my 77
cutlass,and my 77 restoration project, along with other toys

http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-contact.html-.html

http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-photos.html-MerchantID-2
21197-Publish-t-makestatic-true-skip-45.html

you may have to copy and paste the address to web browser.


 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Infinite Space
Systems, Inc.
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 442 Achieva

For a good, consise, defintion of what a muscle car is, by vehicle model and

make, go here:

http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/general/musclecars-definition.shtml

There may be a few surprises.

Milton Schick
1964 442 Cutlass
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "77w30" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 12:52 AM
Subject: RE: 442 Achieva


> It's a opinion and for me hell no. if that's the case a Toyota supra is a
> muscle car, even a Hyundai sonata qualifies than
> Ron
>
>
> rodney fama OCA #033098
> 1969 cutlass s
> 1969 442 north carolinia car
> 1969 442  cali car. assembly required stay away from www.calicars.cc what 
> a
> hassle.
> 1972 cutlass convertable
> 1976 phx y-76 arizona regional car. assy. required
> 1977 cutlass supreme  (3)
> 1986 honda shadow vt 1100c  cruiser
> 1987 cutlass supreme
> 1989 chevy k-2500 4*4 pick up
> 1991 yamaha warrior atv
> 1994 chevy  caprice 9c-1 police pkg
> 732-986-6388 cell
> 732-254-9500 wk 2 pm best time to call week days
> web site. shows disc brake conversion using 79 trans am rear disc on my 77
> cutlass,and my 77 restoration project, along with other toys
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-contact.html-.html
>
>
http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-photos.html-MerchantID-2
> 21197-Publish-t-makestatic-true-skip-45.html
>
> you may have to copy and paste the address to web browser.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Vahabzadeh
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 8:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: 442 Achieva
>
> At 05:13 PM 6/3/06 -0400, ron wrote:
>>Okay you feel that 4 cyl hunk of junk is comparable to a 442. how about I
>>swap you the  front wheel hunk of junk we have at the shop for a nice 69
>>442.
>>Since it ranks right up there.
>>Just think how cool it would look with 60 series tires in the rear and 
>>50's
>>up front for traction.
>> The noise the  of the timeing chain guids rattling after 80,000 miles. 
>> And
>>the 1-1/8 split in the rear for that  fake dual exhaust look while it 
>>idles
>>so rough do being worn out. Where my 442 idled rough do to the cam choice.
>>Lets not forget the oil it burns do to clogged pcv system.
>>At changing the starter is not a problem due to exhaust .the intake is 
>>just
>>in the way. Lol
>>But it's a 442
>
>
> Well, I'm not saying it wouldn't have its issues, but then, many cars do.
> Also, think of the era when that engine was developed, and when the car
> came out.
>
> Would I prefer a Calais 442 FWD to a real RWD one, even the relatively
> anemic 307 versions?  Hell no!  But, does the Calais 442 FWD qualify to be
> considered a musclecar?  Well, maybe yes.
>
> - Joe Vahabadeh
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.1/355 - Release Date: 6/2/2006
>
> 

Reply via email to