Re: 442 Achieva

[steven pignataro]

What does that make my Rallye350? A bastard child? Redheaded stepson?

"Infinite Space Systems, Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

For a good, consise, defintion of what a muscle car is, by vehicle model and
make, go here:

http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/general/musclecars-definition.shtml

There may be a few surprises.

Milton Schick
1964 442 Cutlass
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- Original Message -----
From: "77w30" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 12:52 AM
Subject: RE: 442 Achieva


> It's a opinion and for me hell no. if that's the case a Toyota supra is a
> muscle car, even a Hyundai sonata qualifies than
> Ron
>
>
> rodney fama OCA #033098
> 1969 cutlass s
> 1969 442 north carolinia car
> 1969 442 cali car. assembly required stay away from www.calicars.cc what
> a
> hassle.
> 1972 cutlass convertable
> 1976 phx y-76 arizona regional car. assy. required
> 1977 cutlass supreme (3)
> 1986 honda shadow vt 1100c cruiser
> 1987 cutlass supreme
> 1989 chevy k-2500 4*4 pick up
> 1991 yamaha warrior atv
> 1994 chevy caprice 9c-1 police pkg
> 732-986-6388 cell
> 732-254-9500 wk 2 pm best time to call week days
> web site. shows disc brake conversion using 79 trans am rear disc on my 77
> cutlass,and my 77 restoration project, along with other toys
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-contact.html-.html
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-photos.html-MerchantID-2
> 21197-Publish-t-makestatic-true-skip-45.html
>
> you may have to copy and paste the address to web browser.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Vahabzadeh
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 8:49 PM
> To: oldsmobile@chebucto.ns.ca
> Subject: RE: 442 Achieva
>
> At 05:13 PM 6/3/06 -0400, ron wrote:
>>Okay you feel that 4 cyl hunk of junk is comparable to a 442. how about I
>>swap you the front wheel hunk of junk we have at the shop for a nice 69
>>442.
>>Since it ranks right up there.
>>Just think how cool it would look with 60 series tires in the rear and
>>50's
>>up front for traction.
>> The noise the of the timeing chain guids rattling after 80,000 miles.
>> And
>>the 1-1/8 split in the rear for that fake dual exhaust look while it
>>idles
>>so rough do being worn out. Where my 442 idled rough do to the cam choice.
>>Lets not forget the oil it burns do to clogged pcv system.
>>At changing the starter is not a problem due to exhaust .the intake is
>>just
>>in the way. Lol
>>But it's a 442
>
>
> Well, I'm not saying it wouldn't have its issues, but then, many cars do.
> Also, think of the era when that engine was developed, and when the car
> came out.
>
> Would I prefer a Calais 442 FWD to a real RWD one, even the relatively
> anemic 307 versions? Hell no! But, does the Calais 442 FWD qualify to be
> considered a musclecar? Well, maybe yes.
>
> - Joe Vahabadeh
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.1/355 - Release Date: 6/2/2006
>
>

---

How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.