Sorry to say this but issue is observable since beta release. And there
were no changes to urpmi code and frineds.
When building ISO in ABF we get this:
adding medium "Main"
http://abf-downloads.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva2014.0/repository/i586/main/release/media_info/synthesis.hdlist.cz
0% of 0 completed, ETA = --:--:--, speed = 0
90% of 3408k completed, ETA = --:--:--, speed = 2908k
100% of 3408k completed, ETA = --:--:--, speed = 2141k
Use of uninitialized value in split at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.16.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Signature.pm
line 32.
Use of uninitialized value in split at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.16.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Signature.pm
line 32.
Use of uninitialized value in split at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.16.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Signature.pm
line 32.
Use of uninitialized value in split at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.16.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Signature.pm
line 32.
Use of uninitialized value in split at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.16.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Signature.pm
line 32.
unable to import pubkey file of "Main"
More on bug:
https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627
2014-03-31 1:40 GMT+02:00 Ben Bullard 79 <benbullar...@cox.net>:
> If I remove the repos that came with the install process and try to
> simply add repos (again guys it's mirror list which we normally ask novice
> users to use) with drak-edit-media I get:
>
> Unable to add medium, errors reported:
>
> unable to import pubkey file of "main (Phosphorus2014.0-1)"
> unable to import pubkey file of "main updates (Phosphorus2014.0-2)"
> unable to import pubkey file of "contrib (Phosphorus2014.0-3)"
> unable to import pubkey file of "contrib updates (Phosphorus2014.0-4)"
> unable to import pubkey file of "non-free (Phosphorus2014.0-5)"
> unable to import pubkey file of "non-free updates (Phosphorus2014.0-6)"
> unable to import pubkey file of "restricted (Phosphorus2014.0-7)"
> unable to import pubkey file of "restricted updates (Phosphorus2014.0-8)"
>
> I can file a bug report at some point but currently I'm in my work week of
> 12 hours a day so it may be a few days.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
> On 03/30/2014 04:33 AM, Александр Бурмашев wrote:
>
> The error is "Medium without key". And since all packages are signed with
> the same key - Key ID 180922d8bf81de15, the problem is not with the
> packages, it is with the repository itself.
> I also tried to add the repo, you mention,on my ROSA host and repository
> was added succesfully, key was imported.
> rpm -qa |grep gpg-pubk
> gpg-pubkey-16a853e7-4faae668
> gpg-pubkey-bf81de15-51817942
>
> gpg-pubkey-bf81de15-51817942 - is the openmandriva key, I think you need
> to check if this key is imported on your installation, and in case it is
> not, check the whole procedure of adding the repository.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-03-30 13:18 GMT+04:00 Ben Bullard 79 <benbullar...@cox.net>:
>
> Here's an example (in fresh install of 2014 Beta 3-28 with mirror list
>> enabled):
>>
>> # urpmi -v
>> kernel-nrjQL-desktop-devel-3.12.12-69omv-1-1-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm
>> getting lock on urpmi
>> using mirror
>> ftp://openmandriva.c3sl.ufpr.br/openmandriva/openmandriva2014.0/repository/x86_64/
>> ...
>> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
>> Package Version Release Dist DEpoch
>> Arch
>> (medium "main")
>> gcc 4.8.3_2014.> 2 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> gcc-cpp 4.8.3_2014.> 2 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> glibc-devel 2.19 2 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> lib64cloog-isl4 0.18.1 2 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> lib64isl10 0.12.2 1 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> lib64mpc3 1.0.1 6 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> lib64ncurses-devel 5.9 7.20130218.3 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> lib64nspr-devel 4.10.4 1 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> lib64nss-devel 3.16 1 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> lib64z-devel 1.2.8 7 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> libz1 1.2.8 7 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> make 3.82 12 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> uclibc-lib64menuw5 5.9 7.20130218.3 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> uclibc-lib64panelw5 5.9 7.20130218.3 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> uclibc-lib64tic5 5.9 7.20130218.3 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> (command line)
>> kernel-nrjQL-desktop-devel-3.> 1 1 omv 2014.0
>> x86_64
>> 105MB of additional disk space will be used.
>> 29MB of packages will be retrieved.
>> Proceed with the installation of the 16 packages? (Y/n)
>> Y
>>
>>
>>
>> The following packages have bad signatures:
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/glibc-devel-2.19-2-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm: Medium
>> without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Thu 20 Feb 2014 04:02:57 PM CST, Key ID
>> 180922d8bf81de15))
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64cloog-isl4-0.18.1-2-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm:
>> Medium without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Tue 11 Feb 2014 04:55:56 PM CST, Key ID
>> 180922d8bf81de15))
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64isl10-0.12.2-1-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm: Medium
>> without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Wed 19 Mar 2014 11:27:44 AM CDT, Key ID
>> 180922d8bf81de15))
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64mpc3-1.0.1-6-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm: Medium
>> without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Wed 12 Feb 2014 12:18:00 AM CST, Key ID
>> 180922d8bf81de15))
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64nspr-devel-4.10.4-1-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm:
>> Medium without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Wed 19 Mar 2014 03:40:35 AM CDT, Key ID
>> 180922d8bf81de15))
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64nss-devel-3.16-1-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm: Medium
>> without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Wed 19 Mar 2014 03:40:38 AM CDT, Key ID
>> 180922d8bf81de15))
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/lib64z-devel-1.2.8-7-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm: Medium
>> without key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Tue 11 Feb 2014 04:58:26 PM CST, Key ID
>> 180922d8bf81de15))
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/libz1-1.2.8-7-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm: Medium without
>> key (OK (RSA/SHA1, Tue 11 Feb 2014 04:58:26 PM CST, Key ID
>> 180922d8bf81de15))
>> Do you want to continue installation ? (y/N)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
>> On 03/30/2014 03:34 AM, Александр Бурмашев wrote:
>>
>> Could you please provide more details, at least what mirror you have
>> enabled and what error you get ?
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-30 4:18 GMT+04:00 Ben Bullard 79 <benbullar...@cox.net>:
>>
>>> I'm using mirror list across several computers and installations. For
>>> about 12 hours now no packages appear to be signed. Anyone know what's up?
>>>
>>>
>>> This has to be disconcerting to less tech savvy users.
>>>
>>> Heck it's disconcerting to me... But then I'm not actually all that tech
>>> savvy either...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OM-QA mailing
>> listOM-QA@ml.openmandriva.orghttp://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-qa-openmandriva.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
