2014-09-08 20:01 GMT+02:00 [email protected] < [email protected]>:
> > Il 08/09/2014 00:21, Raphaël Jadot ha scritto: > > > > > 2014-09-03 22:14 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]>: > >> Dnia środa, 3 września 2014 18:26:33 Nicolò Costanza via OM-Cooker pisze: >> > Hi >> > >> > >> > >> > I am wondering if the choose of cooker jumping from gcc to llvm/clang >> has >> > been smart, new GCC 5.0 seems much faster than LLVM/CLANG and is the >> > standard linux compiler >> > >> >> LLVM/Clang is a modern set of compilers with new vision and possibly >> better >> future rather than something that got invented in late 80's. SO yeat from >> that >> pov we did a good move, which also may bring some attention out there. >> >> >> > Furthermore, it's not the time to discuss it, like Tomasz wisely said in > other post, there is now need to focus on 911. However maybe it will be > worth coming back discussing on this topic _after_ 2014.1 is out, because > of several concerns and parameters that may not (and could not) have been > taken in account, nothing urgent however :) > > cheers > > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing > [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > I'm not a compilers guru , but I'm using this compilers since a while, > and as personal experience , > I can assure everybody here that a 2 figure release vanilla gcc just > sucks , so 4.9 vanilla sucks, > but rosa patched it and it works pretty good, ... Honestly I don't really > care that > abf will build my package in 10 minutes or half an hour, but the FACT is > that in gcc builds, and in clang No, > * as far I'm concern *I wont look for workarounds , bootstraps or dirty > fixings, if I have 8 builds for 4 > distros successfully published , I wont search to fix the fifth , and the > excuse " you missed some libs" > it doesn't take any more. > A wild guess ( personal opinion, so obviously "I'm boasting the reality", > as usual..) , we will have up to 20% in cooker/contrib that won't build, > but since those are not supported by OMA , ain't no lost. > Clang is just too young to be promoted as default compiler....again IMHO. > But the choice was made, measures ware taken, i guess we have to live with > it... > PS > Just out of curiosity , somebody knows another distro that switch to clang > as default compiler? > O just we are reinventing the wheel? > > -- > Greetings > > ___________________ > > MRB ain't no shit > > Rosalinux.Ro > > Mandrivausers.Ro > ________________ > > Talk is cheap, show me the code. > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > Hi SymbianFlo, do you think that automating the export CC = gcc for all failed building would be a good solution?
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
