>Clang is just too young to be promoted as default compiler....again IMHO.
You're right. 2014-09-08 22:42 GMT+04:00 [email protected] < [email protected]>: > > Il 08/09/2014 20:08, Raphaël Jadot ha scritto: > > > > 2014-09-08 20:01 GMT+02:00 [email protected] < > [email protected]>: > >> >> Il 08/09/2014 00:21, Raphaël Jadot ha scritto: >> >> >> >> >> 2014-09-03 22:14 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]>: >> >>> Dnia środa, 3 września 2014 18:26:33 Nicolò Costanza via OM-Cooker pisze: >>> > Hi >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I am wondering if the choose of cooker jumping from gcc to llvm/clang >>> has >>> > been smart, new GCC 5.0 seems much faster than LLVM/CLANG and is the >>> > standard linux compiler >>> > >>> >>> LLVM/Clang is a modern set of compilers with new vision and possibly >>> better >>> future rather than something that got invented in late 80's. SO yeat >>> from that >>> pov we did a good move, which also may bring some attention out there. >>> >>> >>> >> Furthermore, it's not the time to discuss it, like Tomasz wisely said >> in other post, there is now need to focus on 911. However maybe it will be >> worth coming back discussing on this topic _after_ 2014.1 is out, because >> of several concerns and parameters that may not (and could not) have been >> taken in account, nothing urgent however :) >> >> cheers >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing >> [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> >> I'm not a compilers guru , but I'm using this compilers since a while, >> and as personal experience , >> I can assure everybody here that a 2 figure release vanilla gcc just >> sucks , so 4.9 vanilla sucks, >> but rosa patched it and it works pretty good, ... Honestly I don't really >> care that >> abf will build my package in 10 minutes or half an hour, but the FACT is >> that in gcc builds, and in clang No, >> * as far I'm concern *I wont look for workarounds , bootstraps or dirty >> fixings, if I have 8 builds for 4 >> distros successfully published , I wont search to fix the fifth , and the >> excuse " you missed some libs" >> it doesn't take any more. >> A wild guess ( personal opinion, so obviously "I'm boasting the >> reality", as usual..) , we will have up to 20% in cooker/contrib that won't >> build, >> but since those are not supported by OMA , ain't no lost. >> Clang is just too young to be promoted as default compiler....again IMHO. >> But the choice was made, measures ware taken, i guess we have to live >> with it... >> PS >> Just out of curiosity , somebody knows another distro that switch to >> clang as default compiler? >> O just we are reinventing the wheel? >> >> -- >> Greetings >> >> ___________________ >> >> MRB ain't no shit >> >> Rosalinux.Ro >> >> Mandrivausers.Ro >> ________________ >> >> Talk is cheap, show me the code. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> > > Hi SymbianFlo, > > do you think that automating the export CC = gcc for all failed building > would be a good solution? > > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing > [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > chitchating about dirty fix, or what m8 ? > -- > Greetings > > ___________________ > > MRB ain't no shit > > Rosalinux.Ro > > Mandrivausers.Ro > ________________ > > Talk is cheap, show me the code. > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
