Il 08/09/2014 20:08, Raphaël Jadot ha scritto:
2014-09-08 20:01 GMT+02:00 [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Il 08/09/2014 00:21, Raphaël Jadot ha scritto:
2014-09-03 22:14 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Dnia środa, 3 września 2014 18:26:33 Nicolò Costanza via
OM-Cooker pisze:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I am wondering if the choose of cooker jumping from gcc to
llvm/clang has
> been smart, new GCC 5.0 seems much faster than LLVM/CLANG
and is the
> standard linux compiler
>
LLVM/Clang is a modern set of compilers with new vision and
possibly better
future rather than something that got invented in late 80's.
SO yeat from that
pov we did a good move, which also may bring some attention
out there.
Furthermore, it's not the time to discuss it, like Tomasz wisely
said in other post, there is now need to focus on 911. However
maybe it will be worth coming back discussing on this topic
_after_ 2014.1 is out, because of several concerns and parameters
that may not (and could not) have been taken in account, nothing
urgent however :)
cheers
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
I'm not a compilers guru , but I'm using this compilers since a
while, and as personal experience ,
I can assure everybody here that a 2 figure release vanilla gcc
just sucks , so 4.9 vanilla sucks,
but rosa patched it and it works pretty good, ... Honestly I don't
really care that
abf will build my package in 10 minutes or half an hour, but the
FACT is that in gcc builds, and in clang No,
_/* as far I'm concern */_I wont look for workarounds , bootstraps
or dirty fixings, if I have 8 builds for 4
distros successfully published , I wont search to fix the fifth ,
and the excuse " you missed some libs"
it doesn't take any more.
A wild guess ( personal opinion, so obviously "I'm boasting the
reality", as usual..) , we will have up to 20% in cooker/contrib
that won't build,
but since those are not supported by OMA , ain't no lost.
Clang is just too young to be promoted as default
compiler....again IMHO.
But the choice was made, measures ware taken, i guess we have to
live with it...
PS
Just out of curiosity , somebody knows another distro that switch
to clang as default compiler?
O just we are reinventing the wheel?
--
Greetings
___________________
MRB ain't no shit
Rosalinux.Ro
Mandrivausers.Ro
________________
Talk is cheap, show me the code.
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
Hi SymbianFlo,
do you think that automating the export CC = gcc for all failed
building would be a good solution?
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
chitchating about dirty fix, or what m8 ?
--
Greetings
___________________
MRB ain't no shit
Rosalinux.Ro
Mandrivausers.Ro
________________
Talk is cheap, show me the code.
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
