That's fine - as long as xscreensaver doesn't screenlock on its own? Then that's just doing the same thing as KDE's, just with a much uglier dialog. On 29 Mar 2016 20:55, "rugyada" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Screensaver is different from screen locker, you know. > I'd rather prefer xscreensaver doing the screensaver job - feature > screenlocker *disabled* - and screen locker its own (enabled or > disabled by default I personally don't care that much, although my > preference goes to disabled and users turn it on if they need) > > > > > 2016-03-30 0:38 GMT+02:00 Ben Bullard <[email protected]>: > > Yes, I would also prefer screen locker off in default install. Users can > > turn on if needed. > > > > Ben Bullard > > ben79 > > -------------------- > > OpenMandriva-QA Team > > > > On 03/29/2016 12:45 PM, Robert Xu wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Any chance we could have xscreensaver off by default? It seems to > interfere > > with KDE's screen locking on its own. If people need it (as was > previously > > justified), we can let them turn it on manually. > > > > Plus, > > > https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2014/05/screenlocker-architecture-in-plasma-next/ > > > > Robert > > > > -- > > cheers, Robert :: rxu.io > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OM-Cooker mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OM-Cooker mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org > > > > > > -- > ____________________ > Best regards, > Cristina > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
