Am 10.12.14 um 20:12 schrieb Dan McDonald:
You said it was ipadm earlier, not dladm.
Well, yes it was. I am sure that ipadm will now hang as well.
On Dec 10, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Stephan Budach <[email protected]> wrote:
Ahh… here we go again…

root@nfsvmpool01:~#  dladm show-linkprop -p mtu
LINK         PROPERTY        PERM VALUE          DEFAULT POSSIBLE
igb0         mtu             rw   1500           1500 60-9000
igb1         mtu             rw   1500           1500 60-9000
igb2         mtu             rw   1500           1500 60-9000
igb3         mtu             rw   1500           1500 60-9000
ixgbe2       mtu             rw   1500           1500 1500-15500
ixgbe0       mtu             rw   1500           1500 1500-15500


root@nfsvmpool01:~#  pstack `pgrep dladm`
23948:  dladm show-linkprop -p mtu

What I did was to remove the ixgbe3 interface and try to set the mtu to 9216 
like this:
How did you remove the ixgbe3 interface?  With delete-phys?

dladm set-linkprop -p mtu=9216 ixgbe3

I seem only to be able to kill dladm by killing it using kill -9 <PID>
It may be hanging because you removed it.

Generally speaking, you shouldn't remove hardware entities (vs. created 
entities like vnics, aggrs, etc.) with dladm.  They are harmless lying in the 
background, if you don't have them configured up with ifconfig or ipadm, you 
won't be using them.

Dan

Maybe I have told things not clearly enough. I have created the interface like this:

ipadm create-if ixgbe3
ipadm create-addr -T static -a 192.168.1.1/24 ixgbe3/v4static

This worked, but I wanted to change the MTU, so I deciced to remove this config again:

ipadm delete-addr ixgb3/v4static
ipadm delete-if ixgbe3

Then I tried to set the MTU of ixgbe3 like this:
dladm set-linkprop -p mtu=9216 ixgbe3

I can't remember, if that already stalled, however, now dladm show-linkprop hangs and it does need to get killed -9.

Cheers,
budy

_______________________________________________
OmniOS-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss

Reply via email to