C. Bergstr?m wrote: > was easier... What if we have a fully open toolchain and a continuous > build server so we *know* when who to blame when the bleeding edge > commits a breaking change... > > This thread is completely off the original intent which is me asking > about libCrun.so.. I have the answer to that now..
There are many automated test suites; more testing is done than just seeing if something boots. You can ask on testing-discuss about these and more. So yes, suncc does in fact get lots of testing. I also might add that suncc is a commercially supported product that is developed by a completely separate team with a different development scheduled than ON. Hence one of many reasons why the latest-and-greatest SSX isn't always a target for ON developers. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker
