Yeah, I fully agree to OLIVER, Dhananjay, and Catherine. It is not only from vim dimension but also tightly related to the architecture design of key modules, and use case support. Maybe we can cooperate this topic with the integrated functional architecture proposal for discussion at our F2F meeting.
In the past mini-summit at Santa Clara, we started a discussion about multi-vim/infrastructure management. Below is the link to the chart used there, where we listed related topics and works done in OPENO to collect more ideas/comments. https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/3245268/infrastructure%20manager.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1492080578000&api=v2 Xinhui Li VMware From: <onap-discuss-bounces at lists.onap.org> on behalf of Yunxia Chen <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, 20 April 2017 at 11:13 PM To: "SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)" <spatsch at research.att.com>, Dhananjay Pavgi <DP00476350 at TechMahindra.com> Cc: "onap-discuss at lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss at lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Support ONAP on multiple OS/Openstacks?
