Thanks Andrei for putting the deck together. It helps to move forward.
It was my intention to build a similar table based on the dependencies 
input<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+Planning+Template#ReleasePlanningTemplate-ONAPDependencies>
 for each and every project.
I posted your table as a reference on wiki at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+Planning#ReleasePlanning-ReleaseDependencies
 and started to build directly into the wiki the same table (so far with only 
approved projects). That should help into avoiding the question “what is the 
latest version?”.

A couple of questions:


1)      I was wondering how to read the dependency table. In other words who is 
the API provider and who is the API consumer? In the Release Planning 
Template<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+Planning+Template#ReleasePlanningTemplate-APIIncomingDependencies>,
 I called it “API Incoming Dependencies” (provider) and “API Outgoing 
Dependencies” (consumer). Your clarification would help (my guess is that the 
projects in the column have dependencies on the projects in the row). Thanks to 
confirm.

2)      Would you mind clarifying the blue boxes “Interact but no direct 
interface”? To some extend everything interact through a different level of 
connection in ONAP.

3)      For the red boxes “Likely but not mentioned”. Would you mind explaining 
where it is not mentioned?  May be we should wait until all projects have 
created their release plan.

4)      Not sure what are the “Change Man”, “Ext Sys Reg” projects. To my 
knowledge, none have not been approved so far, and I do not see them in the 
list of “proposed project<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+Projects>”. 
May be it is just a wording issue. It would help if you could provide a link.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Andrei Kojukhov
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:17 AM
To: Alla Goldner; Phil Robb; Arul Nambi
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Alla, Phil,

Please take an updated slide (attached) – I sent you an email twice by mistake.

BR

Andrei

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 4:06 PM
To: Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org>; Arul Nambi <arul.na...@amdocs.com>
Cc: Elhay Efrat <elhay.efr...@amdocs.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 
onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Hi Phil, all,

Given the huge number of approved projects and their complexity, from one side, 
and lack of well-defined interactions and interfaces between those 
projects/modules representing the projects, from the other side, I would say we 
may need a meeting to define those, to synchronize on those, to see if all 
needed interfaces are indeed defined etc.

We’ve been trying to access the complexity internally and came up with the list 
of all potential interactions which will have to be developed, attached. The 
list may not be fully correct, I will be happy to upload it (just needs to know 
what would be the ideal placement for it) and invite the community to respond 
and introduce all required modifications. The list will have to be extended 
once we approve more projects.
(Please note that Integration and Documentation interfaces with all projects, 
but there is no need to build interface, just to coordinate.)

My development experience tells me such a mission can’t be achieved by project 
calls only, or even project-to-project calls, but requires a dedicated meeting, 
the sooner the better.

My 2 cents ☺

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D2E914.228CB470]

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:47 AM
To: Arul Nambi <arul.na...@amdocs.com<mailto:arul.na...@amdocs.com>>
Cc: Elhay Efrat <elhay.efr...@amdocs.com<mailto:elhay.efr...@amdocs.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
<onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Hi Arul:

The problem with doing "both" is that if not enough people get in the room 
together physically, then for those that took the time, expense, and effort to 
get there they will not get much value from it.  If there is critical mass that 
get together in the room, then those remote, and on the phone *never* get 
nearly as much out of it as those in the room.

I would like to better understand what we would do at a group gathering, 
virtual or physical in late July.  Can folks propose propose agenda topics so 
we can see what we would want to accomplish, and from that we can figure out 
the best format it?

Thanks,

Phil.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Arul Nambi 
<arul.na...@amdocs.com<mailto:arul.na...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
+1 why can we not have both?

From: Elhay Efrat
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 5:31 AM
To: jamil.cha...@orange.com<mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com>; Arul Nambi 
<arul.na...@amdocs.com<mailto:arul.na...@amdocs.com>>
Cc: Dhananjay Pavgi 
<dp00476...@techmahindra.com<mailto:dp00476...@techmahindra.com>>; Gadiyar, 
Rajesh <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>; GILBERT, 
MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; 
Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
<onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Why not always add vitrual ☺ ?

From: jamil.cha...@orange.com<mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com> 
[mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:00 AM
To: Arul Nambi <arul.na...@amdocs.com<mailto:arul.na...@amdocs.com>>
Cc: Elhay Efrat <elhay.efr...@amdocs.com<mailto:elhay.efr...@amdocs.com>>; 
Dhananjay Pavgi 
<dp00476...@techmahindra.com<mailto:dp00476...@techmahindra.com>>; Gadiyar, 
Rajesh <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>; GILBERT, 
MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; 
Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
<onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

My understanding the agreement was to have a virtual meeting in July and a 
physical one in September
Best
Jamil

Le 14 juin 2017 à 01:11, Arul Nambi 
<arul.na...@amdocs.com<mailto:arul.na...@amdocs.com>> a écrit :
+1 for virtual meetings

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Elhay Efrat
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:41 AM
To: Dhananjay Pavgi 
<dp00476...@techmahindra.com<mailto:dp00476...@techmahindra.com>>; Gadiyar, 
Rajesh <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>; GILBERT, 
MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; 
Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
<onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Good , can we do also F2F over webex , skype … something ☺?

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Dhananjay Pavgi
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 6:45 AM
To: Gadiyar, Rajesh 
<rajesh.gadi...@intel.com<mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>; GILBERT, MAZIN E 
(MAZIN E) <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; Kenny Paul 
<kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
<onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

+1

thanks & regards,
Dhananjay Pavgi
Mobile : +91 98220 22264<tel:+91%2098220%2022264>
<image001.png>               <image002.jpg>
www.techmahindra.com<http://www.techmahindra.com/>                 Platinum 
Member. Visit : http://www.onap.org<http://www.onap.org/>

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gadiyar, Rajesh
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:12 AM
To: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) 
<ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; Kenny Paul 
<kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
<onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

+1 Good idea ☺

From: <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> 
on behalf of "GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" 
<ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>
Date: Monday, June 12, 2017 at 2:01 PM
To: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Cc: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, onap-tsc 
<onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

I was not present for this discussion. We need to have a meeting around the 3rd 
week of
July to go through project by project progress. Phil and I discussed a virtual 
meeting
since folks will be too busy to travel, and some may not be able to.

Would like to get a sense from the TSC community if this is appropriate and more
convenient while voting for dates.

thanks
Mazin

On Jun 12, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Kenny Paul 
<kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:

Please respond to the doodle poll below no later than:
Thurs. 01:00 PM UTC
Thurs. 09:00 PM China
Thurs: 09:00 AM Eastern
Thurs: 06:00 AM Pacific

https://doodle.com/poll/7zufivqebtnvrhdt<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doodle.com_poll_7zufivqebtnvrhdt&d=DwMCAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=7n6f3RBF3LtkjuBpPhqrMbVfiHC_wqVOfDz5z3uutjM&s=W2yLAyRSo72NJJvcQibUZP8thCi407eXKwPoV15Q3N8&e=>

Thank You.

Best Regards,
-kenny

Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>
510.766.5945<tel:(510)%20766-5945>

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=7n6f3RBF3LtkjuBpPhqrMbVfiHC_wqVOfDz5z3uutjM&s=8D2aZuG-pN820woJDvlHxyXQnkAsRt0bFjokAPWgc1E&e=

============================================================================================================================
Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally within TechMahindra.
============================================================================================================================
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc



--
Phil Robb
Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to