Hi Michael and Phil,
I wish this is just an unintentional mistake during synchronizing information
between "approved SDC proposal page" to "Resources and Repositories" in the
wiki page. Otherwise I would be greately confused on the pratice of removing
committer from an approved project acording to the procedure we have defined on
TSC Charter:
A Committer for a project who is disruptive, or has been inactive on that
project for an extended period (e.g., six or more months) may have his or her
Committer status revoked by the project’s Project Technical Leader (PTL) or by
super-majority vote of the project’s committers.
The Project Technical Leader is responsible for informing the Technical
Steering Committee (TSC) of any committers who are removed or resign.
Is there any explanation on the issue Zhaoxing mentioned in his mail?
Best Regards,
Yuan Yue
原始邮件
发件人：孟照星10024238
收件人： <[email protected]>
抄送人： <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
日 期 ：2017年07月06日 14:45
主 题 ：[onap-tsc] sdc committers
Hi Michael,
I noticed that some of the committers have been removed from Resources and
Repositories even though they're listed as committer in the approved SDC
proposal page .
There is a guideline from TSC about project participants, for community
diversity, a project is encouraged to have at least three companies involved,
Currently only 2 in SDC. Given that ZTE has seed codes for SDC listed in the
approved proposal page for Catalog, workflow designer and VNF designer, I think
the committers from ZTE should also be listed at the Resources and Repositories
page.
Thanks and Regards,
Zhaoxing
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
