Yuan Yue, I have not examined this particular project, but the TSC and I have requested last week during the review phase of projects for R1, that the PTLs clean up the list of committers to 3-5, as some are more qualified to be contributors than committers. We have projects with 16-20 committers and 2-3 contributors. PTLs should work with their project team to clean-up the list to a core set of committers but should do it in total transparency and openness. If the TSC needs to provide clearer guidelines then we can discuss today in our TSC Meeting.
thanks Mazin On Jul 6, 2017, at 4:42 AM, yuan....@zte.com.cn<mailto:yuan....@zte.com.cn> wrote: Hi Michael and Phil, I wish this is just an unintentional mistake during synchronizing information between "approved SDC proposal page" to "Resources and Repositories" in the wiki page. Otherwise I would be greately confused on the pratice of removing committer from an approved project acording to the procedure we have defined on TSC Charter: A Committer for a project who is disruptive, or has been inactive on that project for an extended period (e.g., six or more months) may have his or her Committer status revoked by the project’s Project Technical Leader (PTL) or by super-majority vote of the project’s committers. The Project Technical Leader is responsible for informing the Technical Steering Committee (TSC) of any committers who are removed or resign. Is there any explanation on the issue Zhaoxing mentioned in his mail? Best Regards, Yuan Yue 原始邮件 发件人：孟照星10024238 收件人： <ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; 抄送人： <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>; 日 期 ：2017年07月06日 14:45 主 题 ：[onap-tsc] sdc committers Hi Michael, I noticed that some of the committers have been removed from Resources and Repositories<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories-23ResourcesandRepositories-2DServiceDesign-26Creation&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=zagCM6lrm4jcHVIcirLmNorTBnCLgbojm4GVc3NWGnA&s=Rh22X_mCmzS8_EO9qjo-2jykCdNsuY16eIupnnXtmts&e=> even though they're listed as committer in the approved SDC proposal page<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D3246935&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=zagCM6lrm4jcHVIcirLmNorTBnCLgbojm4GVc3NWGnA&s=3tVHPJlG3uxBEh4Ed8Mr_SaEJeR_0oP2lZT59VEAieM&e=> . There is a guideline from TSC about project participants, for community diversity, a project is encouraged to have at least three companies involved, Currently only 2 in SDC. Given that ZTE has seed codes for SDC listed in the approved proposal page for Catalog, workflow designer and VNF designer, I think the committers from ZTE should also be listed at the Resources and Repositories page. Thanks and Regards, Zhaoxing _______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=zagCM6lrm4jcHVIcirLmNorTBnCLgbojm4GVc3NWGnA&s=WzM6PSwQz7jZ2SxUp_oMzcrP2JB3z4oWonomCFpPfPg&e=
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
