Hi Mazin,
Thank you for your response! My concern is if we followed a proper principle
to remove the committers from an approved project abiding by TSC charter and
open source spirit. I believe TSC charter does not grant PTLs the privilege to
move committers to contributor list directly. I do not recall that TSC has made
a decision to ask the PTL to clean up the committer list at this point of time.
I remember in TSC meeting people suggested we can look back and clear the
committer list based on their contributions in Amsterdam development after we
reached our Amsterdam goal.
Thanks,
Zhaoxing
原始邮件
发件人： <[email protected]>
收件人：袁越10008526
抄送人：孟照星10024238 <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
日 期 ：2017年07月06日 19:26
主 题 ：Re: [onap-tsc] sdc committers
Yuan Yue,
I have not examined this particular project, but the TSC and I have requested
last week during the review phase of projects for R1,
that the PTLs clean up the list of committers to 3-5, as some are more
qualified to be contributors than committers.
We have projects with 16-20 committers and 2-3 contributors. PTLs should work
with their project team to clean-up
the list to a core set of committers but should do it in total transparency and
openness. If the TSC needs to provide clearer guidelines then we
can discuss today in our TSC Meeting.
thanks
Mazin
On Jul 6, 2017, at 4:42 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Michael and Phil,
I wish this is just an unintentional mistake during synchronizing information
between "approved SDC proposal page" to "Resources and Repositories" in the
wiki page. Otherwise I would be greately confused on the pratice of removing
committer from an approved project acording to the procedure we have defined
on TSC Charter:
A Committer for a project who is disruptive, or has been inactive on that
project for an extended period (e.g., six or more months) may have his or her
Committer status revoked by the project’s Project Technical Leader (PTL) or by
super-majority vote of the project’s committers.
The Project Technical Leader is responsible for informing the Technical
Steering Committee (TSC) of any committers who are removed or resign.
Is there any explanation on the issue Zhaoxing mentioned in his mail?
Best Regards,
Yuan Yue
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=zagCM6lrm4jcHVIcirLmNorTBnCLgbojm4GVc3NWGnA&s=WzM6PSwQz7jZ2SxUp_oMzcrP2JB3z4oWonomCFpPfPg&e=
发件人：孟照星10024238
收件人： <[email protected]>
抄送人： <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
日 期 ：2017年07月06日 14:45
主 题 ：[onap-tsc] sdc committers
Hi Michael,
I noticed that some of the committers have been removed from Resources and
Repositories even though they're listed as committer in the approved SDC
proposal page .
There is a guideline from TSC about project participants, for community
diversity, a project is encouraged to have at least three companies involved,
Currently only 2 in SDC. Given that ZTE has seed codes for SDC listed in the
approved proposal page for Catalog, workflow designer and VNF designer, I
think the committers from ZTE should also be listed at the Resources and
Repositories page.
Thanks and Regards,
Zhaoxing
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
