Hi Kenny, According to Repositories and Resources Wiki page repos such as ci-management, demo, oparent belong into Integration project<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories#ResourcesandRepositories-Integration> According to Bitergia (cf screenshot below), these 3 repos belong to "ONAP-General" which does not really relates to an ONAP project. [cid:[email protected]] Any reasons? I think these 3 repos should belong to Integration, and we should get rid of "ONAP-General".
Thanks, Gildas ONAP Release Manager 1 415 238 6287 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 2:36 PM To: onap-discuss <[email protected]> Subject: [onap-discuss] Bitergia Data Changes As mentioned on the PTL call this morning I had a pull request into Bitergia to update the information to align to specific projects. The config has now been updated. [cid:[email protected]] A couple of key changes: - Each ONAP project now has its own line item , under which the associated repos are aligned. - Previously missing repos have been added - Locked repos associated with the original open-o or ecomp seedcode are no longer reported on PTLs please take a look at your repos listed using either the git or gerrit views and please open a helpdesk ticket if something is missing. https://onap.biterg.io Best Regards, -kenny Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 510.766.5945
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
