None other than I didn’t move them down when I was editing the json file :-) I’ll fix it and send another pull request, but I’ll wait for a bit to see if anyone else sees changes that need to be made. Best Regards, -kenny
Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager [email protected] 510.766.5945 > On Jan 22, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Gildas Lanilis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Kenny, > > According to Repositories and Resources Wiki page repos such as > ci-management, demo, oparent belong into Integration project > <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories#ResourcesandRepositories-Integration> > According to Bitergia (cf screenshot below), these 3 repos belong to > “ONAP-General” which does not really relates to an ONAP project. > <image001.jpg> > Any reasons? I think these 3 repos should belong to Integration, and we > should get rid of “ONAP-General”. > > Thanks, > Gildas > ONAP Release Manager > 1 415 238 6287 >
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
